We Are Improving!

We hope that you'll find our new look appealing and the site easier to navigate than before. Please pardon any 404's that you may see, we're trying to tidy those up!  Should you find yourself on a 404 page please use the search feature in the navigation bar.  

Thursday, 12 January 2017 16:51

Another delay possible in Tillmon trial

Written by
Rate this item
(1 Vote)

A possible delay in the trial of Operation Rockfish defendant Antonio Tillmon could be in the offing after his new attorney filed a motion for a continuance in the police corruption case.

Tillmon is the only defendant in the case to enter a not guilty plea. The other 14 have accepted plea deals and are tentatively scheduled for sentencing in March.
Tillmon’s trial at the federal courthouse in Greenville had been scheduled for the February term.
Now, however, his attorney, Paul K. Sun Jr. of Raleigh, has requested an order from United States Senior District Judge Malcolm Howard to set the trial for the weeks of April 24 and May 1.
“Mr. Tillmon is charged with ten counts,” Sun wrote this week in a motion contained in the federal court record, noting the counts include conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute heroin and cocaine, conspiracy to use and carry firearms, attempt to possess with intent to distribute, and federal programs bribery. “Undersigned counsel was appointed pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act after Mr. Tillmon’s former counsel was permitted to withdraw.”
Sun notes he has worked diligently and in good faith to meet with Tillmon and become familiar with the case.
However, he wrote, “The amount of discovery in the case is significant, comprising substantial paper discovery, electronic files, numerous audio and video recordings, and related transcripts. Thus, counsel reasonably requires additional time to prepare for trial.”
The attorney advised the government on his intent to the file the motion to continue and says the government does not oppose it. “This motion is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay. Undersigned counsel has not previously sought to continue the trial date. The ends of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.”

Read 3357 times