Fog

Roanoke Rapids, NC

66°F

Fog

Humidity: 100%

Wind: N at 0 mph

Friday, 12 November 2010 13:06

Well deserved near packed house


Rate this item
(0 votes)

Playing against Old Dominion University and Chapel Hill, Roanoke Rapids succeeded Thursday night.

Playing against a handful of naysayers and doomsday ill wishers, Roanoke Rapids succeeded Thursday night.

111210secor

We would simply rate the Old Crow Medicine Show concert at the Roanoke Rapids Theatre the best that’s been in the struggling venue in its history.

We may be biased because we like this band but there was proof all around Thursday night that we weren’t alone.

We saw it in the smiling faces of young, old and in between. We saw it in the smiling face of a young man, Tre Fromal, who got a personal invitation from the band to enjoy a hard driving, hard rocking, hard fiddling, hard picking show from a band that isn’t played on oldies stations and has earned stripes by doing what they did Thursday night, take a chance on a venue with a tarnished history because they just enjoy playing.

The estimates we got from law enforcement, which has a knack for head counts, and sources close to the show, put the crowd at 75 to 80 percent of occupancy and we were glad to see it because if any band deserves it, it is OCMS, which has made its living on the road and not on soft core, Nashville cookie cutter radio play.

The city also deserves this strong attendance because this theater has been beat up, battered and kicked around, to steal a line from another country alternative favorite, Hank Williams III.

111210dancing

Fans of the band also deserved it and we saw so many young faces in the crowd who turned the venue into what it should be, a place to enjoy themselves, let loose and not sit morosely in the audience, but get up and dance, sing and shout encouragement and favorite songs for the band to play.

Old Crow Medicine Show did everything we expected them to do and more. They used Roanoke Rapids as a proving ground for several unreleased songs and let the audience know they were appreciative they were asked to play at a place which has been vilified through bad press, bad jokes and bad management until Thursday night.

The volunteers we talked about earlier this week were smiling and they had a right to because they came together to help, not out of personal gain, but, as we said, civic pride.

The combination worked and now the hard part comes, for the temporary management of this venue to top what they did Thursday night.

We don’t normally respond to comments left on our website and we’re going to be kind, but one reader, responding to our volunteer editorial, said, “I did buy a ticket. Mostly (I admit) to satisfy my curiosity about how much of a train wreck this is going to be.”

There was no train wreck Thursday night, there was a near packed house and perhaps some understanding that, in the right hands, when the theater is not used as a bus terminal, it can work — Editor.

 

Lance Martin

Lance Martin

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

comments  

 
+1 #13 Michael 2010-11-30 21:37
Just some food for thought on what a well-run theater in NC can accomplish. I received this information in an e-mail today from DPAC (Durham Performing Arts Center), which is celebrating 2 years in operation.

They've had over 500,000 guests in attendance, and over 85 sold-out shows.

They have 11,000 season ticket holders.

Upcoming shows are Jerry Seinfeld, John Mellencamp, Diana Ross, Blue Man Group, Wanda Sykes and Cedric the Entertainer.

Amazing what can be accomplished in two years when you do things right, isn't it?
Quote
 
 
0 #12 Solution? 2010-11-16 23:46
I disagree. A deed in lieu of foreclosure is still must be entered into voluntarilyand in good faith by both parties. There is no guarantee the bank would agree, particularly if the indebtedness exceeds the FMV of the property (and I don't know if it does or doesn't). I guess it really would depend on whether the cost to foreclose would exceed and loss incurred in accepting a deed in lieu of foreclosure.
Quote
 
 
-1 #11 Maureen 2010-11-16 22:04
Quoting Solution?:
Maureen, it would still be "our" problem because the city would be responsible for any shortfall in the mortgage if the bank was unable to sell the property for the amount remaining on the note - if it were able to sell it at all. The problem of the theater is more complex than residents seem to think.


Actually, you're wrong. It's like a deed in lieu of foreclosure. The bank wouldn't pursue a shortfall, because it's a toxic asset on the town's books. The place is definitely worth much less than it cost, but collecting from the town would be impossible. It's like Orange County, California and their bankruptcy.
Quote
 
 
0 #10 Solution? 2010-11-16 21:05
Maureen, it would still be "our" problem because the city would be responsible for any shortfall in the mortgage if the bank was unable to sell the property for the amount remaining on the note - if it were able to sell it at all. The problem of the theater is more complex than residents seem to think.
Quote
 
 
-2 #9 Maureen 2010-11-16 15:09
Quoting Solution?:
This is not a viable solution as the bank holds a mortgage and would never allow the destruction of the collateral.


Then maybe the answer is as simple as turning the property over to the bank and letting it become their problem.
Quote
 
 
-2 #8 Marie 2010-11-16 14:44
Michael, if the theater is "demolished" the debt is still there and who's going to pay for that.....you??? Can you afford $150,000.00 plus a month for a mortgage pymt? What good is a hole in the ground that can attract nothing but dirt? At least with the theater there and the right person in charge there is the potential for success. As citizens of RR we are all paying for it so we might as well get some use out of it instead turning it in to dust.
Quote
 
 
+2 #7 Solution? 2010-11-16 13:27
Demolish it? This is not a viable solution as the bank holds a mortgage and would never allow the destruction of the collateral. Sorry, but we need a solution that reflects the reality of the situation. I think that the only true solution is to forge ahead.... the more shows the better.
Quote
 
 
-1 #6 Michael 2010-11-16 01:57
The answer is recognizing it as an ill-conceived venture, demolish it, and walk away. The facility is in the wrong place to attract the right audience, and doesn't seat enough people to turn a profit even if it was in the right place. We go to events at DPAC in Durham, 2,700 seats and is constantly sold out. Look at their website and notice the diversity and quality of the shows offered there. We've seen plays, comedians and concerts there, as well as A Prairie Home Companion. If you want a successful business model, look at them. The problem is, you couldn't attract these quality acts to this area to such a small venue, and even if you did, nobody here would pay the $50 and up ticket prices. So let's stop trying to make a silk purse out of a sow's ear. Unless someone wants to buy it outright and take their chances with community theater, the town needs to unload this albatross ASAP.
Quote
 
 
+3 #5 Solution? 2010-11-16 00:47
It's a THEATER...if "putting on a show" and thereby selling tickets for money is not the answer then what is? Michael - you have identified the theater as a worthless business hemorrrhaging money...so what is the solution? Obviously selling it would take the burden off the city...but what should the next owner do? It SHOULD be an asset for the city no matter who owns it...so how do we/they make it work?
Quote
 
 
-2 #4 Michael 2010-11-15 19:41
I think too many people in Roanoke Rapids have been watching too many Andy Hardy movies. "Let's put on a show!" is not the answer to the financial disaster that is the Roanoke Rapids theater. I'm a businessman, and all the turnout, public support, interest by volunteers, etc. is worthless when you are hemorrhaging money. This is a business, and when a business loses money you unload it, not throw good money after bad.
Quote
 

Add comment

All comments posted on rrspin.com must be written in complete sentences with no text message abbreviations. No all caps comments will be allowed, that includes words written in capital letters for emphasis.

There is to be no profanity and there is to be no character assassination even if the person being written about is a suspect in a crime.
Comments that presume knowledge of a person’s home life, financial situation or other personal details will be not be posted as will comments which presume legal knowledge.

All comments must be on the topic of the story and offer the reader’s insight on a particular issue. rrspin.com will cease posting comments if the editor determines readers are infighting with one another and not staying on the topic of a story.

rrspin.com prefers readers use their real names because anonymous posters are accountable for their comments just as readers who post their names are.


Security code
Refresh