Fog

Roanoke Rapids, NC

63°F

Fog

Humidity: 100%

Wind: N at 0 mph

Thursday, 13 January 2011 13:11

Calling for a rational discussion of legalization


Rate this item
(7 votes)

The story of the indoor grow operation has given us a glimpse of how Roanoke Valley residents feel about the legalization of marijuana.

Some comments are more sage than others, some comments less than sage.

rrspin.com believes it is time for state legislators to at least discuss the matter and consider calling for an end to its prohibition, even if it is just to allow its use for medical purposes or to allow farmers to grow varieties without THC as an alternative to tobacco, which, by the way, is also a drug.

First, let us say, with the laws the way they are now, what Kristopher Patterson was allegedly doing at his house is illegal and the police department had every right to seize the plants and the materials used in this operation and arrest him. Just because you feel marijuana should be legalized doesn't mean police can look the other way, they would be derelict in their duties if they did so and face a firestorm of trouble themselves.

We believe, however, the current marijuana laws are antiquated and need to have at least thorough review by our state elected officials.

We believe the state has to look past the Reefer Madness hysteria created by famed newspaperman William Randolph Hearst and the DuPont corporation which led to its prohibition in the 1930s.

Many laws on the books already reflect a departure from this outdated thinking, the thinking that marijuana is a killer drug used by crazed jazz hounds, freethinking liberals and rapists.

The punishment for simple possession of marijuana is not as harsh as the crime of drinking a beer underage, which we believe shows lawmakers at least recognize alcohol is a far more deadly drug than pot.

Law enforcement recognizes and knows crack cocaine is the scourge of the Roanoke Valley and that crimes committed against you, the car and house break-ins, the armed robberies, are fueled by its addiction.

Law enforcement rarely runs into a crime committed by a pothead to get that next fix.

The crimes, other than possession or manufacturing, marijuana does create here are brought on by turf wars by other drug dealers. Your GPS being stolen from your car, your guns being stolen from your home or cash being stolen from your purse, overwhelmingly reflects the cocaine problem here. We need to stop and be thankful that we're not overrun with the meth problem here because if it does hit, the crimes committed by methheads will far outweigh anything a crackhead has ever done to get a fix.

We believe study after study shows marijuana is no more harmful than cigarette smoking and we believe it is far safer than alcohol use.

We believe it serves more purposes, from clothing to fuels to food than tobacco in its heyday ever could.

Our founding fathers knew this.

"Hemp is of first necessity to the wealth and protection of the country," Thomas Jefferson said.

"Make the most you can of the Indian Hemp seed and sow it everywhere," said George Washington.

They recognized its value. Unfortunately, as this country progressed, companies like DuPont and purportedly several of the big oil companies, recognized its value and were threatened by it.

Instead of researching its commercial value beyond getting stoned, they lobbied congress and won without much debate.

Like Jefferson, we believe hemp serves a valuable purpose, and its production would help our economy.

While we know we are one small voice, we would encourage an open minded debate on the matter in Raleigh. One led by health experts, leaders in commerce, law enforcement and, yes, the National Organization for the Reformation of Marijuana Laws.

Until laws are changed, there will be more stories like these in rrspin.com and other news outlets and until laws are changed, police have no choice but to make these arrests. If they did anything else they would be derelict in their duties — Editor.

 

 

 

Lance Martin

Lance Martin

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

comments  

 
+4 #12 1 MORE FROM THE ROAD 2011-01-30 20:16
LEGALIZE IT!!!
Quote
 
 
+2 #11 Anthony Finney 2011-01-17 04:21
Quoting shining star:
Cathy not taking away anything from young people serving because thank God we have them but i dont believe that 18 is a responsible age to allow people to buy alcohol and make good decisions.
Then why is it okay for them to die for you in a war? That sounds like a MUCH more dire decision than rather or not to drink a beer, doesn't it? I personally believe if the legal drinking age is 21, then the minimum age to enlist into the US military should likewise be changed to 21. As a prior service Marine, who served with those under the age of 21 regularly, I can tell you that most of them can readily access alcohol with their military ID without a problem, even though the birth date is on there. I guess more people than just a few eel they are entitled to have a drink if they are willing to defend this country. It's already bad enough that they are not entitled to the Bill of Rights in whole once they enlist... at least give them the right to drink.
Quote
 
 
-8 #10 Sharon Arquilla 2011-01-16 23:46
Lance, your story doesn't clearly state the difference between growing Hemp as a usable vegetable matter crop and Marijuana. I know that this opinion piece wasn't meant to be a PHD dissertation, but I think that's misleading.
There are many people who would be in favor of Hemp as a renewable vegetable matter resource with extensive potential for use in our society.
That sort of Hemp crop has NOTHING to do with high content THC marijuana grown for the sole purpose to alter ones mind.
The "not as bad as this, that, and the other" doesn't hold water; It just doesn't pass any tests of logic as a argument.
And the comparison with cigarettes? Hemp to replace tobacco as a cash crop for local farmers, maybe....Smoking THC-less Hemp instead of Tobacco, come on....lol
Please site a few of your "study after studies" claiming "no more harmful than cigarettes." Most intelligent people are stopping Tobacco abuse due to it's adverse effects. Hemp yes, dope....nope
Quote
 
 
-6 #9 SML 2011-01-16 18:57
Many myths surround the use of certain drugs,particula rly marijuana and cocaine.these include the incorrect belief that the drugs are not addictive or that they somehow can enhance performance.recent research proves that such beliefs are false.Cannabis(mariju ana)also called pot or grass this is what it does relaxes the mind and body ,heightens perception,and causes mood swings. As for long term affects possible brain,heart,lun g and reproductive system damage.Visible signs are red eyes,LACK OF PHYSICAL COORDINATION,LE THARGY.Thats just what america needs.We already have the drunks driving and killing helpless children,now pills being misused and there is really nothing we can do about that.I think it should all be ILLEGAL.Is this what are country is coming to?As for our founding fathers they did not have the medical information we have today that defines the health risk that come along with the use of these DRUGS.
Quote
 
 
-4 #8 Michael 2011-01-16 00:04
It's a bit of a stretch saying that the person committing a break-in or robbery isn't using their ill-gotten gains to buy pot instead of crack. An addict of any stripe can be driven to illegal acts to fund their addiction. I don't think I want to share the road with someone who is stoned on pot (or crack, or meth, etc.) anymore than I want a drunk driver in the next lane. So if we move forward with legalization of pot, let's hope we think ahead to control when its use is acceptable, and when it isn't.
Quote
 
 
+3 #7 Chris Christofferson 2011-01-15 23:23
Im not trying to get up here and bash nobody just to voice my opinion. I would like for marijuana to be legalized for my anxiety because i am sick and tired of taking these xanax when cannabis makes me feel better without the drogginess and 'slow motion' of them pills. Thanks for the chance to post my opinion. Your doing a great job Lance
Quote
 
 
+4 #6 shining star 2011-01-15 23:10
Cathy not taking away anything from young people serving because thank God we have them but i dont believe that 18 is a responsible age to allow people to buy alcohol and make good decisions.
Quote
 
 
-3 #5 Cathy 2011-01-14 17:27
Great piece. However I feel that before we we look at repealing this law the drinking age should be addressed. How many young men and women have died in Iraq but still would be arrested for having a beer.....just don't see that as fair.
Quote
 
 
+2 #4 Brandon Cashwell 2011-01-13 21:16
good read Lance
Quote
 
 
+1 #3 cvdurhm 2011-01-13 14:20
Standing - O

Great piece
Quote
 

Add comment

All comments posted on rrspin.com must be written in complete sentences with no text message abbreviations. No all caps comments will be allowed, that includes words written in capital letters for emphasis.

There is to be no profanity and there is to be no character assassination even if the person being written about is a suspect in a crime.
Comments that presume knowledge of a person’s home life, financial situation or other personal details will be not be posted as will comments which presume legal knowledge.

All comments must be on the topic of the story and offer the reader’s insight on a particular issue. rrspin.com will cease posting comments if the editor determines readers are infighting with one another and not staying on the topic of a story.

rrspin.com prefers readers use their real names because anonymous posters are accountable for their comments just as readers who post their names are.


Security code
Refresh