Fog

Roanoke Rapids, NC

63°F

Fog

Humidity: 100%

Wind: N at 0 mph

Saturday, 25 June 2011 17:02

Alternatives to $350K


Rate this item
(0 votes)

Monday city council will begin looking at some $350,000 to cut from its proposed budget for the upcoming fiscal year.

Maybe they don't have to.

We believe much of the cuts have already been made and there's no need to cut so deep that jobs could be lost, jobs that would affect the service citizens in the city are receiving such as trash pickup, police and fire protection.

It was fool-hearty to bank on a 1 cent sales tax to correct the city's budget woes or even plan a budget based on hopes the voters of Roanoke Rapids, had it been approved by the General Assembly, would ratify it in a referendum.

We agree with City Manager Paul Sabiston that the budget for the upcoming fiscal year is solid and lean. We agree with Mayor Emery Doughtie, who asserted that cutting out what little capital expenditures are in the proposal could cause the city maintenance and service woes in the future.

We believe the savings are already in the budget and stand behind the city manager who has all but sworn on the Bible his budget will stand.

Those savings include what will be saved by deferring part of the city's balloon payment on the theater. Those savings include reductions in what the city will be paying in health and property and casualty insurance.

Now if some of the city council members would agree to not be paid for a year there's another $56,000 in savings.

That would go a long way to perhaps restoring some of the faith the public has lost in city council as they continue to grapple with the debt bog that has become the Roanoke Rapids Theatre.

After talking with sources we believe there is another revenue stream that should be tapped and although we risk being run out of town on a rail, we believe it's workable, perhaps not palatable.

There is talk circulating about perhaps going back to vehicle stickers, according to what our sources are telling us, that and stickers for trailers.

Charging $15 to $20 for a vehicle sticker could help the city raise money that will be needed when the end of the upcoming fiscal year rolls around.

Before you jump on us, however, be honest with yourself. When the end of the upcoming fiscal comes, you're either going to be faced with the reality of a property tax increase or having your services cut. You're going to face losing amenities that you may take for granted like parks and services, things which make a community attractive.

With the loss of the theater reserve fund, there has to be solutions out there beyond letting trash pile up, closing the library or the recreation centers. We truly believe these things make a community what it is and believe that when that happens you will really hear the complaining.

Residents had their chance to talk about the budget during council's public hearing. None showed up and for all the complaining that is done behind computer screens, we were disheartened to see no one dared chastise council publicly. We can only take that to mean they must be fairly satisfied with the budget or they just don't care.

While it's easy to throw darts at the current city council, only two of them were seated when the theater came to Roanoke Rapids.

We believe the mayor is trying to do his best to navigate these treacherous waters and one way or another the public is going to have to pay for sins of the past.

We certainly believe that council must, and we implore them to, cut their pay for a year and we also believe that something like a vehicle sticker and trailer sticker would surely taste better than a huge tax increase or going without trash being picked up — Editor

 

Lance Martin

Lance Martin

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

comments  

 
+1 #6 S Y K 2011-06-27 17:28
We already pay a Vehicle Sticker Tax throught the DMV everytime you renew your tag. It's 6.00 in Roanoke Rapids. Even though you dont get any thing for the sticker you used to get a Plate that went on the front of your vehicle. Now you just pay the $6 and get nothing but the city still gets the $6. That's money they are making, I guess it is used to fix roads or something.
Quote
 
 
+2 #5 Maureen 2011-06-27 15:22
I went to city council meetings for years, and became disgusted when it was clear they weren't even listening when I (or anyone else) spoke. At this point I e-mail them (to keep an audit trail), and lobby the state attorney general to step in and address their cronyism.

When times get rough, families have to tighten their belts and do without. Why should the city be any different? Just raising taxes is going to backfire on them.

We can live without the library, recreation centers and parks for awhile if we have to. The only programs that should be funded are those that ensure public health and safety, like police, fire and garbage collection. Maybe giving up a few things will make us appreciate them more, or we'll realize that we never needed them in the first place.
Quote
 
 
+1 #4 letsgoastepfurther 2011-06-26 13:44
This city council is so afraid of overstepping their authority that they are unable to do their job. GS159-13(a)says "the governing board shall adopt a budget ordinance making appropriations and levying taxes for the budget year in such sums as the board may consider sufficient and proper, whether greater or less than the sums recommended in the budget". If the mayor and council are not happy with the managers draft budget they need to change the amounts proposed themselves, not send it back to the manager and finance director. They have already made a proposal. Time for council to make a decision, not act like they don't have responsibility for what is going on.
Quote
 
 
+6 #3 CONCERNED 2011-06-25 18:57
I have sources too, and mine say that we never stopped paying a vehicle sticker fee, we just no longer get the sticker. I think it was changed when vehicle taxes began to be collected by the county. Source also says that the fee has its own line item in the budget. If you check the 2011-2012 Draft Budget you will see that there is $69,500 in this revenue already included in the budget. Also, my source says that the fee is at the max allowed by current law, and can't go up without approval of the state legeslature.
Quote
 
 
0 #2 rrcitizen 2011-06-25 17:51
The City will need to hire at least part-time employees to sell stickers. City Hall staff has been cut in recent years. They have trouble meeting deadlines now, so give them more work with no more pay (again) and no help.
Quote
 
 
0 #1 Kimberly 2011-06-25 17:39
Agree on nobody showing up! I cannot tell you how many hearings I have been at where less than 5 people speak their mind. Even when it is absolutely not possible for me to be at a hearing, I make my feelings known by emailing council members and the mayor.

A proposal of vehicle stickers is fair. What I object to is the city and county CONSTANTLY coming to the trough of property tax. Mighty hard to swallow when you are 1 of the few who actually pay property taxes compared to the many who benefit from city services and never pay. So yes, I would agree to a vehicle sticker, at a reasonable fee, and by that I mean less than 30/per vehicle, in order to broaden the scope of those who have to pay into this mess.

I personally cannot handle any more property tax; between the city and the county, it is running me into the ground. It is also absolutely not fair for 40% to carry what should be covered by all.
Quote
 

Add comment

All comments posted on rrspin.com must be written in complete sentences with no text message abbreviations. No all caps comments will be allowed, that includes words written in capital letters for emphasis.

There is to be no profanity and there is to be no character assassination even if the person being written about is a suspect in a crime.
Comments that presume knowledge of a person’s home life, financial situation or other personal details will be not be posted as will comments which presume legal knowledge.

All comments must be on the topic of the story and offer the reader’s insight on a particular issue. rrspin.com will cease posting comments if the editor determines readers are infighting with one another and not staying on the topic of a story.

rrspin.com prefers readers use their real names because anonymous posters are accountable for their comments just as readers who post their names are.


Security code
Refresh