Overcast

Roanoke Rapids, NC

77°F

Overcast

Humidity: 74%

Wind: NW at 9 mph

Banner

Wednesday, 04 May 2011 17:17

WRAL reports RVRS settles fed suit


Rate this item
(0 votes)
Squad members on the water this spring. Squad members on the water this spring.

WRAL is reporting today an ambulance service in Roanoke Rapids has agreed to pay the state and federal governments $1.5 million to settle a lawsuit over allegedly fraudulent Medicare and Medicaid claims.

The TV station reported Mark Collier, commander of the Roanoke Valley Rescue Squad, said in a letter to squad members that the settlement is not an admission of wrongdoing. The squad only wanted to avoid the cost of defending the suit, he said.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services filed a complaint against the squad last year, alleging that it transported patients for routine medical treatments who didn't meet eligibility requirements for ambulance service.

Collier said in the letter that the squad has tightened its practices by contracting with a new billing company, appointing a compliance officer, conducting more internal and external audits and increasing its review of whether non-emergency dialysis patients have a medical necessity for transportation.

"We want to let everyone know that health care billing today is an extremely complex process, and we have worked with great effort to strengthen and improve not only our billing process but our documentation systems as well," Collier wrote

In December, Jeffery Batts, attorney for the squad, said the government's suit primarily involves a period from 2004 to 2006 and alleged fraudulent activity concerning billing mainly involving the transport of dialysis patients.

Responding to emailed questions from rrspin.com then, Batts said the rescue squad does not anticipate the lawsuit will affect its means or ability to do transports following resolution of the case.

“The government's complaint relates primarily to the period from 2004 to 2006. RVRS denies the government's allegations in the complaint, in particular those alleging any fraudulent activity,” Batts said. “In 2008, out of an abundance of caution, RVRS revised its training program, hired additional review staff and coordinated procedures with referring doctors to ensure no additional issues will arise.”

The complaint, Batts said, related solely to a previous command. “The U.S. Attorney's Office has stated that they have no issues with the procedures utilized by RVRS under its current commander, Mark Collier, who has been in office since 2008. Mark Collier provides his services as commander for RVRS as an unpaid volunteer.”

The attorney said the disagreement concerns documentation related primarily to a portion of the dialysis transports. “RVRS contends that much of that documentation is correct as submitted. RVRS contends that the remaining documentation was submitted in reliance upon information provided by its billing company at the time, which RVRS believed to be in compliance with Medicare regulations.”

Progress has been made to resolve the case, Batts said. “We anticipate the matter can be resolved in the near term.”

The complete list of  the original rrspin.com stories on the suit can be viewed by following these links:

http://rrspin.com/News-from-Roanoke-Rapids-Weldon-and-Halifax-County/RVRS-suit-Squad-working-with-feds.html

http://rrspin.com/News-from-Roanoke-Rapids-Weldon-and-Halifax-County/RVRS-suit-Thousands-of-false-claims.html

http://rrspin.com/News-from-Roanoke-Rapids-Weldon-and-Halifax-County/RVRS-suit-10-patient-stories.html

 

 

Lance Martin

Lance Martin

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

comments  

 
+4 #3 local resident 2011-05-09 11:52
What they were being sued for is non-emergency transports to doctor's offices, dialysis and other non-emergent transports. It is totally different than when you pick up the phone and call 911. 911 we have to take you for a stubbed toe if you want to go but non-emergent transports are different in that the person can not walk by themselves, requires constant oxygen, has amputations anything that prevents them from being able to ride in a car or CPTA bus. RVRS is not the only transport company that has fudged so to speak on paperwork but they were the only ones that got caught due to the volume of transports they do daily. I don't like the fact they are trying to push it off on past commands since those that are currently running the place were there under the past command. That is a way to pass the buck so to speak. They make decent money doing transports however, I am sure that settlement will hurt them some. Either way it's done, it's over move on to the next thing.
Quote
 
 
+4 #2 LSD 2011-05-08 22:45
Does RVRS have enough cash in the till that it can simply write a check for $1.5 million? That's a lot of money. Will the squad try to recover the money from those it transported, i.e., those for whom it improperly billed the government?
Quote
 
 
-3 #1 mike 2011-05-08 16:28
well just what are the requirements for riding in an ambulance.(dead?)
Quote
 

Add comment

All comments posted on rrspin.com must be written in complete sentences with no text message abbreviations. No all caps comments will be allowed, that includes words written in capital letters for emphasis.

There is to be no profanity and there is to be no character assassination even if the person being written about is a suspect in a crime.
Comments that presume knowledge of a person’s home life, financial situation or other personal details will be not be posted as will comments which presume legal knowledge.

All comments must be on the topic of the story and offer the reader’s insight on a particular issue. rrspin.com will cease posting comments if the editor determines readers are infighting with one another and not staying on the topic of a story.

rrspin.com prefers readers use their real names because anonymous posters are accountable for their comments just as readers who post their names are.


Security code
Refresh