Overcast

Roanoke Rapids, NC

79°F

Overcast

Humidity: 74%

Wind: SE at 6 mph

Banner

Wednesday, 18 May 2011 15:12

Report: Mining ban lift would endanger Roanoke


Rate this item
(0 votes)
A man fishes from a dock in Williamston. A man fishes from a dock in Williamston.

Lifting a state-wide ban on uranium mining would threaten the Roanoke River and other rivers as well as drinking water supplies in the region with radioactive pollution and toxic chemicals, American Rivers said Tuesday.  

The threat from a proposed uranium mine in the Roanoke basin earned the river a spot on the organization’s annual list of America’s Most Endangered Rivers.

The Roanoke flows from the Blue Ridge Mountains in Virginia to North Carolina’s Outer Banks.  It provides drinking water to more than one million people in Virginia Beach, Norfolk and other communities.  

Recently, Raleigh, North Carolina applied to tap 50 million gallons a day from the basin. The dangers of extracting uranium ore, which requires intensive use of water and chemicals and leaves behind radioactive and contaminated waste, inspired the Virginia state legislature to place a ban on uranium mining in 1982. A uranium mining company is now pushing to lift the ban and develop a deposit on a tributary of the Roanoke in Pittsylvania County.  

Geologists believe there are other deposits elsewhere in Virginia and the East.   

American Rivers says that if the Virginia legislature succumbs to industry pressure and fails to uphold its 30-year ban on uranium mining, the health of rivers and communities in the region will be at risk for centuries to come.  

American Rivers and its partners called on the Virginia legislature to uphold its ban on uranium mining to protect the Roanoke and rivers statewide.  

“This uranium operation would generate millions of tons of toxic, cancer-causing waste,” said Peter Raabe of American Rivers. “We’re talking about a radioactive legacy that would last for generations.” 

“The Roanoke River, spawned on the Blue Ridge of Virginia and North Carolina, wanders through the  hills, farmland,  and communities of both states on its way to the ocean.  The region’s history, culture and future are forever bound to the river.  We are grateful to American Rivers for shining a national spotlight on this incredible resource and on the irrefutable threat from potential uranium mining, milling and waste disposal,” said Andrew Lester, executive director of the Roanoke River Basin Association.

 “Virginia Uranium says  it will mine safely, just as BP said it would drill safely.  The lesson here is that things do not always go according to plan, and we  should not be playing high-stakes roulette with a waterway that serves local growers, local anglers and a vibrant tourist economy from Virginia Beach to the Outer Banks,”  said Cale Jaffe, senior attorney with the Southern Environmental Law Center.

 “The evidence that Virginia is subject to unusually heavy and concentrated rainfalls has continued to accumulate since the 1980's, with several instances of more than 20 inches of rain in 24 hours. This characteristic of Virginia's climate that caused so many local and state leaders concern in the 1980's makes the engineering of liquid waste lagoons and radioactive soils to ensure no radioactive material is released exceptionally difficult.  Flooding and storm water discharge of radioactive material is a probability, not a possibility,” said Chris Miller, executive director of Piedmont Environmental Council. 

The potential health impacts of exposure to uranium and mining chemicals are well-documented, and include cancer, birth defects, hormone disruption, and damage to vital organs. Developing a uranium industry in Virginia is considered especially risky because of the region’s high rainfall and frequently severe  hurricanes and storms (like the tornado that touched down April 17 just a few miles from the proposed mine site). Severe weather could result in wastewater contaminating rivers, streams, and drinking water supplies.   

“Virginia’s leaders demonstrated great foresight and moral courage when they banned uranium mining thirty years ago,” said Raabe. “The question now is whether they will continue to protect our clean water, or allow this mining company to create a poisonous future for the region’s communities.” 

Last modified on Wednesday, 18 May 2011 15:19
Lance Martin

Lance Martin

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

Add comment

All comments posted on rrspin.com must be written in complete sentences with no text message abbreviations. No all caps comments will be allowed, that includes words written in capital letters for emphasis.

There is to be no profanity and there is to be no character assassination even if the person being written about is a suspect in a crime.
Comments that presume knowledge of a person’s home life, financial situation or other personal details will be not be posted as will comments which presume legal knowledge.

All comments must be on the topic of the story and offer the reader’s insight on a particular issue. rrspin.com will cease posting comments if the editor determines readers are infighting with one another and not staying on the topic of a story.

rrspin.com prefers readers use their real names because anonymous posters are accountable for their comments just as readers who post their names are.


Security code
Refresh