Drizzle

Roanoke Rapids, NC

64°F

Drizzle

Humidity: 94%

Wind: SE at 5 mph

Banner

Thursday, 23 June 2011 17:01

Mayor advocates for council salary deferment


Rate this item
(0 votes)

Mayor Emery Doughtie believes there is already $350,000 in cuts from the city's proposed budget for the upcoming fiscal year without having to slice the plan further.

That money is made of the $250,000 the city will save by deferring a balloon payment on the theater and $50,000 in savings by switching providers Tuesday night for casualty insurance.

The third factor, the mayor said today, would require at least three council members to vote to give up their salaries for a year, which equals $56,000, thus giving the city $356,000 in cuts.

Originally scheduled to meet Tuesday at 6 p.m. to discuss the cuts proposed by Councilman Ernest Bobbitt this past Tuesday, council, because of scheduling conflicts, will instead meet Monday at 5:15 p.m. at the Lloyd Andrews City Meeting Hall to go over them.

Doughtie believes City Manager Paul Sabiston will most likely not budge from the financial plan he submitted to council for its approval.

Therefore, Doughtie, who does not have a vote, says it will be his suggestion to council the cuts are already there through the deferral and insurance savings.

That leaves getting at least three votes from council to defer their salaries for a year. “I don't think we can cut it without cutting back on capital expenses. The thing that bothers me is we would be having to neglect maintenance items and end up with real serious problems.”

With the financial shape the city is in, Doughtie says he has a problem with council continuing to take salaries. “Suetta (Scarbrough) is retired, Greg (Lawson) is retired, Ernest is retired. Carl's (Ferebee) got a good job and I have a good job. We could cut it or defer it for one year. I think if you talked to 10 people, more would want to see us give it up.”

Otherwise, with a lean capital budget, the mayor believes the only thing there would be to cut is personnel.

Meanwhile, Doughtie said he is going to continue pressing for a 1 cent sales tax referendum, the loss of that from consideration by the General Assembly being the reason Bobbitt asked for the cuts Tuesday night.

Lance Martin

Lance Martin

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

Latest from Lance Martin

comments  

 
+3 #3 Kimberly 2011-06-25 16:15
Well, anyone on the council that voted for the monstrosity that we all now face should be ASHAMED not to give up their salary; it should not even have to be "SUGGESTED". They all got Dolly's boobs and Dolly's money in their heads and that's all it took to lead us into an unbelievable nightmare that may still yet bankrupt this town if this council and future councils cannot GET SERIOUS about cutting out ridiculous spending. How many 10's of 1000's have been thrown down the rabbit hole of the waste transfer station? is it a problem that needs to be addressed.. yes.. now, heck no... nothing else but maintaining current services and working on this debt should even be considered by this city for expenditures, and yes, council persons who still take a salary, especially if you voted for theater, SHAME ON YOU! you've already near about bankrupted me with tax hikes, enough's enough, go after your own pocket for a while.
Quote
 
 
+1 #2 CONCERNED 2011-06-24 13:11
CWEC you must be an insider. You know things that only someone keeping the books at city hall would know, like what specific things the mayor and council are giving their salaries for. I wondered how you knew so much about council screw ups. I appreciate you being willing to speak up and tell us whats going on behind the closed doors and inside the secret meetings. Any other secrets you want to spill before they fire you too?
Quote
 
 
+2 #1 cwec 2011-06-24 02:09
The mayor is wrong about about the deferring of the $250,000. It is a payment that we are going to have to make sooner or later and the later it is before the money is paid the more it is going to cost the taxpayers. A savings would be this avenue project that is going to cost the taxpayers in the neighborhood of $70,000-$100,000 not including the $71,000+ grant. As far as the salaries for each of the council members it should be left up to them. Members have given up their salaries for things like repair of the street sweeper,money for the boys and girls club and other things. The Capital expenses are things that could be looked at. It is time for this city council to get down to business. Something that this city council and mayor need to do is remember that many of us taxpayers are facing hard times and we need you to help us out and start this year to help us out for the future. Sometimes you do have to micro-manage to get things going down the right path.
Quote
 

Add comment

All comments posted on rrspin.com must be written in complete sentences with no text message abbreviations. No all caps comments will be allowed, that includes words written in capital letters for emphasis.

There is to be no profanity and there is to be no character assassination even if the person being written about is a suspect in a crime.
Comments that presume knowledge of a person’s home life, financial situation or other personal details will be not be posted as will comments which presume legal knowledge.

All comments must be on the topic of the story and offer the reader’s insight on a particular issue. rrspin.com will cease posting comments if the editor determines readers are infighting with one another and not staying on the topic of a story.

rrspin.com prefers readers use their real names because anonymous posters are accountable for their comments just as readers who post their names are.


Security code
Refresh