Halifax County District Attorney Melissa Pelfrey said prosecutors from across the state are trying to get a group together to interpret the findings of the study.
“I don’t know what affect this will have, if any,” she told rrspin.com today.
Pelfrey said more than 200 motions have been filed by defense attorneys across the state requesting further motions in death penalty cases be delayed until the study is completed.
Ward
Of the four cases, one person, Michael Ward, has already been sentenced to death for the 1997 murder of Patricia Smith King. The state Supreme Court, however, ordered a re-sentencing in 2001.
The other death penalty cases, which have not gone to trial are:
Hawkins
• Gene Arnold “Root Root” Hawkins, charged in the 2006 death of Shelby Salmon.
Rouse
• Joshua Rouse, charged in the 2009 murder of Sandy Denise Reidel.
Gorham
• Tony Maurice Gorham, charged in 2010 murders of Nancy Burgess and Maxine McCrary.
According to an affidavit of one of the study’s authors — Catherine M. Grosso, an assistant professor of law at the university — she and Barbara O’Brien, also a Michigan State assistant law professor, began a statewide study in North Carolina to determine whether race has played a significant role in seeking or imposing the death penalty.
The study, which began August 11, 2009, examined race and the death penalty from 1990.
Their $500,000 study looked at many nonracial factors that prosecutors used to determine whether to pursue the death penalty.
There is to be no profanity and there is to be no character assassination even if the person being written about is a suspect in a crime.
Comments that presume knowledge of a person’s home life, financial situation or other personal details will be not be posted as will comments which presume legal knowledge.
All comments must be on the topic of the story and offer the reader’s insight on a particular issue. rrspin.com will cease posting comments if the editor determines readers are infighting with one another and not staying on the topic of a story.
rrspin.com prefers readers use their real names because anonymous posters are accountable for their comments just as readers who post their names are.