Mostly Cloudy

Roanoke Rapids, NC

64°F

Mostly Cloudy

Humidity: 100%

Wind: N at 0 mph

Banner

Tuesday, 15 November 2011 23:41

Gatling puts cash offer on table for theater


Rate this item
(0 votes)
Gatling and his wife sign the papers to run the theater before he defaulted. Gatling and his wife sign the papers to run the theater before he defaulted. Lance Martin for rrspin.com

In a proposal that could alleviate dire budget problems for the next fiscal year, Lafayette Gatling has offered to buy the Roanoke Rapids Theatre in a cash deal.

Terms of the offer were not released following a closed session during an emergency meeting of council tonight. Specifics of the deal are expected to be released by the city in December.

While it has long been said if sold the theater would not capture the $21 million the city originally invested in the venue, city officials tonight declined to discuss a ballpark figure the Chicago businessman was offering.

City Attorney Gilbert Chichester said following the meeting this was a cash only deal, which if approved, would put the building back on the tax rolls at $80,000 a year and save the city some $100,000 a year in operating costs.

It is a deal, Chichester said, that would substantially reduce the principle amount as well as reduce the payments on the building. It will also give the city more time to refinance the debt left on the building.

Chichester said Gatling initiated the negotiations, which have been ongoing since September. Gatling has not told the city what his plans are for the building, but has indicated he wants to buy additional property surrounding the theater.

“It certainly reduces the potential for raising taxes,” Mayor Emery Doughtie said following the meeting.

While Doughtie and other city officials tonight acknowledged Gatling had defaulted on his payments when he was charged with running the building, the mayor said, “This is a very different financing environment.”

Chichester and Doughtie explained the cash will have to be in hand for the deal to be consummated.

Interim City Manager Ed Wyatt said the deal should be ready within the next two days. “This opportunity will take some pressure off the budget and allow us to do the things we need to do to get by.”

In a prepared statement, Doughtie said, “Several weeks ago the city received an offer from Mr. Lafayette Gatling to purchase the Roanoke Rapids Theatre. Since that time, the city, through City Attorney Gilbert Chichester, has worked with the Gatlings to bring the offer to a level that can be acceptable to both parties.”

The statement continues, “By working in-house, we have been able to salvage what would have been spent on a realtor's commission fee. When the property is passed from city ownership to private ownership, it will go on the tax books. The Roanoke Rapids Theatre currently costs the taxpayers at least $100,000 a year just in operating expense. This sale will remove those costs.”

Doughtie continued reading, “Another benefit of the sale will be the opportunity to search for a more favorable means of financing the remaining obligations. The numerous uncertainties in the existing debt contract pose huge potential for higher costs to the city.”

By lowering the principle amount owed, the statement said, “The city will at least be able to concentrate on more of the essential services that our citizens deserve and expect. With this bit of breathing room, we can also continue to evaluate operating costs and take advantage of opportunities to become more effective and efficient.

“It is our expectation that the necessary documents should be completed in the very near future. Both parties are committed to executing the contract as soon as possible.”

Lance Martin

Lance Martin

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

comments  

 
0 #20 Ken Gallahan 2011-11-28 22:03
If Mr. Gatling makes the financial investment necessary to operate the RR Theatre as a full-time business, he is likely to earn himself 3-5 million dollars a year in profits. Something the City couldn't or wouldn't do.
Quote
 
 
+6 #19 For Sale? 2011-11-25 23:14
Yeah its important to sell the theater, but has the city advertised the theater in other locations that it is for sale or do they take the first offer that comes along. Not to point any fingers, but does the city council have any clue to what its doing. It sounds like they have had 3 chances at it and still don't know what to do with it and all the consequences lies on the property owners.
Quote
 
 
+8 #18 cwec 2011-11-18 13:22
The deal making with the RRT has been going on for about three months behind closed doors. WHAT is the emergency? Something really fishy is going on again at city hall. Look out taxpayers we are about to get it again WITHOUT alot of say in the matter. I agree we need to do something but it is time the city council be open with us before the deal is inked. Let us hear all the facts. Lets make sure this time.
Quote
 
 
-24 #17 mrs.rene 2011-11-16 16:50
go mr gatling am happy you got theatre back.lets show roanoke rapids how to make money.randy patron was doing ok.when big rich came dru here i never saw that many pepole in our town.RR should have did a background check on patron or did they.i think that BIB RICH CONCERT scared them.
Quote
 
 
+3 #16 Kimberly 2011-11-16 16:01
Quoting OUTSIDER LOOKING IN:
My guess is Gatling will want to take the theater for a fire sale price of 33 cents on the dollar, or around $7 million.


and that should be turned down flat
Quote
 
 
+4 #15 Kimberly 2011-11-16 15:59
Quoting cwec:
It is time the taxpayers vote on this issue because the city council does not have a good track record when making these types of decisions.


Herein lies the biggest problem of all. Every single taxpaying citizen who will end up holding the bag in 1 form or another on this bunch of mess should be ringing the phones off the hook in the att gen, gov, lt gov office, state house rep (angela bryant), state sen rep (ed jones) and DEMANDING that legislation be put forth that stops every single town council, city council, or local body of government of any type from being allowed to put their jurisdiction in any more than 500,000 dollars of debt on any 1 project at any time without the citizens approving it via a vote on the matter. This town council, like the 1 before it, can get us into a world of mess financially, we are left holding the bag financially and they trot off into the sunset with their happy go lucky selves.
Quote
 
 
0 #14 OUTSIDER LOOKING IN 2011-11-16 15:52
My guess is Gatling will want to take the theater for a fire sale price of 33 cents on the dollar, or around $7 million.
Quote
 
 
+5 #13 Kimberly 2011-11-16 14:45
Quoting OUTSIDER LOOKING IN:
I would have expected something like this from the 2005 council, but not the current council that ran on a platform of honest, open communication with the public.


If you have been watching the current council at all since it's inception, you would know that was not ever really the truth in the end on the way they are doing things. It's no different than before at the end of the day.
Quote
 
 
+15 #12 OUTSIDER LOOKING IN 2011-11-16 13:55
Lance, you need to read general statute 160A-269. This offer should have included a 5% deposit, and the amount being offerred is public information AS SOON AS CITY COUNCIL agrees to consider it. I also think it is strange that although they have been discussing this since Sept, council makes a press release one week after the election. I would have expected something like this from the 2005 council, but not the current council that ran on a platform of honest, open communication with the public.
Quote
 
 
-1 #11 Kimberly 2011-11-16 03:41
If the offer is reasonable AND he pays his outstanding debt to the city as well, I say sell the white elephant. We know there will be a loss involved; HOWEVER, the city should not even consider anything less than 15 million. The taxpayers have been NOTHING but hosed in this deal right from the start. I hope the city powers that be use some common sense this time around and are not so-to-speak "blinded by the boobs" yet again. Bottom line, dump it and figure out a way to pay what's left, as long as we are not holding on to WAY TOO MUCH to make it feasible. First part of character is to pay off your debts; so, he should be required to pay what is already owed to the city. The taxpayers should not get to hold on to that amount too. Also, I hope the city leaders will not see this as a license to spend, spend, spend, once again. I hope they have learned a valuable lesson from what has been done to the people of this city.
Quote
 

Add comment

All comments posted on rrspin.com must be written in complete sentences with no text message abbreviations. No all caps comments will be allowed, that includes words written in capital letters for emphasis.

There is to be no profanity and there is to be no character assassination even if the person being written about is a suspect in a crime.
Comments that presume knowledge of a person’s home life, financial situation or other personal details will be not be posted as will comments which presume legal knowledge.

All comments must be on the topic of the story and offer the reader’s insight on a particular issue. rrspin.com will cease posting comments if the editor determines readers are infighting with one another and not staying on the topic of a story.

rrspin.com prefers readers use their real names because anonymous posters are accountable for their comments just as readers who post their names are.


Security code
Refresh