Mostly Cloudy

Roanoke Rapids, NC

64°F

Mostly Cloudy

Humidity: 100%

Wind: N at 0 mph

Banner

Saturday, 11 June 2011 10:30

Council to discuss pulling of sales tax


Rate this item
(0 votes)

City council is expected to discuss the pulling of its proposal for a 1 cent sales tax referendum by legislators this week at Tuesday's meeting.

The pulling of the proposed bill comes as the city faces a bleak 2012-2013 fiscal year after theater reserve funds were depleted for the upcoming fiscal year.

“We were anxious but optimistic,” Mayor Emery Doughtie said Friday. “What was disappointing was the reason and rationale.”

Doughtie said the city was only asking lawmakers for permission to have a referendum on the matter so voters could say whether they would want the sales tax.

The mayor is hopeful that artists coming in for next week's Rapids Jam concert will have an opportunity to explore the theater and there will be discussions about the theater at Tuesday's meeting, which begins at 7 p.m. at the Lloyd Andrews City Meeting Hall on Jackson Street.

Regardless of that discussion, Doughtie said it is important for council to begin planning for the 2012-2013 fiscal.

That fiscal year, the mayor said, is when the city will see, “How much that debt costs us.”

Republican lawmakers felt the proposed bill would set a precedent in town's throughout the state which are facing what Roanoke Rapids is facing. “It was disappointing to me,” Doughtie said. “We didn't have any choice in this debt being put on us.”

Doughtie compares the situation the city will be in with the 2012-2013 fiscal year budget to the one the city's school system faced this year.

The mayor said he believed city residents would have supported the sales tax had the bill passed, simply because the alternative would have been a property tax increase. “I could see how much we could plan and provide services.”

The city was considering the sales tax to pay close to $23.4 million in theater debt.

“The bill, as envisioned by the city, would allow the residents of Roanoke Rapids to vote on a referendum allowing for a 1 cent local sales tax to be charged within our city limits only and to benefit the city alone in order to pay its debt obligations relating to the Roanoke Rapids Theatre,” a draft said.

The letter said while the debt of the theater is $21.5 million, the balance, if paid off early or refinanced is closer to $23.4 million. “The city’s present annual debt for the theater is over $1.7 million or 11.33 percent of our budget. The city wishes to control this debt in a manner that does not place a heavy burden on our local property taxpayers. We believe a sales tax of 1 cent, using the standard exemption to sales tax recognized by state law, is the best way to repay this debt.”

The difference between this request and others, the letter said, was the city was requesting a sales tax for just the incorporated limits of its jurisdiction, not the unincorporated areas of Halifax County.

“Also, this is merely a request for authorization to hold a referendum on the question of the local sales tax and, if passed, permission to enact it by the city council. This is not an outright request to apply the tax without first going to our residents for a vote of approval. We believe this is the way to govern ourselves and give us a path to take care of our own debt without asking the state for direct or indirect assistance with repayment.”

The letter noted the city estimates an annual sales tax just in the city limits will produce an annual revenue of $1.7 million to $2.1 million. With the exception of possible administrative fees, the amount projected was close to the annual debt of the theater. “Our request would be to use these proceeds only for theater debt, apply it only until the theater debt is paid in full and then the local sales tax should expire.”




 

 

Lance Martin

Lance Martin

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

comments  

 
+1 #4 CONCERNED 2011-06-14 15:26
WAY BACK WHEN,THE PREVIOUS COUNCIL WAS ADVISED OF THERE SPENDING PRACTICES BUT DID THEY LISTEN,OBVIOUSL Y THEY DID NOT.SO UNTIL EACH ONE OF THE COUNCIL members THINK FOR THEMSELVES AND CAST THERE OWN VOTE FOR WHAT THEY TRULY BELEIVE IS THE RIGHT THING TO DO FOR THE CITIZENS OF ROANOKE RAPIDS .NOTHING WILL CHANGE.I THINK THAT WE DO HAVE SOME SMART PEOPLE ON THE COUNCIL AND THE MAYER ALSO.IF THEY WOULD ALL PUT THERE MINDS TOGETHER,I BELEVE THAT FINACIAL SITUATION WOULD CHANGE FOR THE BETTER.THE PEOPLE OF ROANOKE RAPIDS NEED TO KNOW IN THERE HEARTS , THAT THE COUNCIL MEMBERS ARE THINKING OF THE CITIZENS AND NOT have SOME HIDDEN AGENDA,LIKE HAS BEEN GOING ON IN THE PAST.I MYSELF WISH THAT I KNOW WHAT THE ANSWERS ARE TO RESOLVE THE SITUATION.IAM SURE THAT THE CITIZENS AND THE CITY LEADERS ALSOWISHED THAT THEY KNEW WHAT THE ANSWERS ARE .I GUESS THERE IS NO MAGIC WOND TO WAVE,JUST HAVE TO KEEP MOVING FORWARD AND HOPE THAT THE RIGHT DECISIONS ARE MADE.
Quote
 
 
+4 #3 cwec 2011-06-13 22:22
I read an article in the local paper Sunday about the looming fallout since the one cent tax is not going to be brought up this year. The person that the mayor and city council need to really pay attention to what she has to say is the finance director. She if anyone would know which way we need to proceed. We do not need to keep letting this problem get so out of hand that we as taxpayers have to pay the ultimate price which will be a huge tax increase. All of us know that things have to increase from time to time but we should not have to keep paying for the mistakes of a few.
Quote
 
 
+8 #2 Maureen 2011-06-12 21:42
What does it take to have the state or federal government come in and take over financial control of the city? It's obvious that the elected officials are incompetent, and incapable of doing the job. When responsible management is so obviously lacking, there must be another level of governance at our disposal. The citizens don't deserve this.
Quote
 
 
+9 #1 cwec 2011-06-11 12:25
Seems to me the city council put the eggs in the wrong basket again. We as taxpayers can not keep having this done to us year after year. They should have looked at more than one option and tightened the belt awhile back. Just because something is in a budget does not mean you need to spend it.The$200,000 road repaving project is one thing, the avenue project that really has no cost figures and is not even in the budget is another.Things like this can be stopped or put on hold until we figure out what to do next. In 2011-2012 budget there are things that can be taken out because if it is the budget it will be spent.
Quote
 

Add comment

All comments posted on rrspin.com must be written in complete sentences with no text message abbreviations. No all caps comments will be allowed, that includes words written in capital letters for emphasis.

There is to be no profanity and there is to be no character assassination even if the person being written about is a suspect in a crime.
Comments that presume knowledge of a person’s home life, financial situation or other personal details will be not be posted as will comments which presume legal knowledge.

All comments must be on the topic of the story and offer the reader’s insight on a particular issue. rrspin.com will cease posting comments if the editor determines readers are infighting with one another and not staying on the topic of a story.

rrspin.com prefers readers use their real names because anonymous posters are accountable for their comments just as readers who post their names are.


Security code
Refresh