Cloudy

Roanoke Rapids, NC

66°F

Cloudy

Humidity: 100%

Wind: S at 4 mph

Banner

Wednesday, 22 June 2011 00:57

Council remands budget to city manager


Rate this item
(0 votes)

By a 3-2 vote tonight, council sent the proposed budget for the upcoming fiscal year back to the city manager to trim some $350,000 from the financial plan.

The action was done on a motion by Councilman Ernest Bobbitt, citing the General Assembly's decision last week to shelve a proposal pitched by city council for a referendum which would allow voters in Roanoke Rapids to decide if they wanted a 1 cent sales tax to pay for theater debt.

Council members Suetta Scarbrough and Carl Ferebee sided with Bobbitt while Greg Lawson and Ed Liverman voted against the measure.

The action tonight sets up a meeting next Tuesday at 6 p.m., one which City Manager Paul Sabiston said could a lengthy one, to go over the budget after numerous work sessions have been held on the matter.

While in his motion Bobbitt asked for $350,000 in cuts, he also asked for longevity pay to be put in the plan at 100 percent and code enforcement merit pay to be put in at 100 percent, moves that will leave the budget in the black, he said.

When first questioned by Lawson on what cuts he had in mind, Bobbitt was evasive and Lawson responded, “I don't have a crystal ball to know what you're thinking.”

Ferebee said the city manager could look at capital items.

Lawson said council needed some firm ideas to keep from appearing wishy-washy and to give the city manager some direction.

Bobbitt then said there were several vehicle requests from the fire, public works and parks and recreation departments that could be cut, along with dump trucks and outsourcing auto repair and grass cutting that would trim about $263,000 from the plan. He said there were items within the recreation department such as scoreboards, benches and other equipment that could be delayed.

Liverman said the cuts would have to be distributed fairly and equitably across all departments. “I'd hate to see $350,000 in cuts put on the backs of our departments and children. I just want this to be an equitable and fair process.”

Said Lawson: “It's unfortunate the theater is driving the decisions here.”

Mayor Emery Doughtie suggested council look at not taking any pay, which save the city $56,000. “I do feel like before we take any services away, the citizens want us to take up some of the slack.”

Ferebee said, however, he believes the citizens don't want to see council do their jobs for nothing. He said in the last month council has had 20 meetings, which equals time away from family and two to three hours away from work.

Sabiston told council to prepare for a meeting next Tuesday in which they would go over the budget item by item.

He said he doesn't agree with the changes suggested.

After the meeting he said, “I'm going to review it to the extent I can. I'm going to make the recommendation I feel is appropriate.”

Sabiston said he already disagrees with putting longevity and merit pay back in the budget. He also said the city getting the opportunity to have a referendum on the sales tax was a long shot. “This budget stands on its own without a 1 cent sales tax … We've been working on this for four months. The sales tax was a recent development.”

 

 

Lance Martin

Lance Martin

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

comments  

 
+3 #10 Jennifer Alexander 2011-06-23 21:09
Bobbitt also is fine with cutting out the matching 401K funds for city employees. Could that be because State law mandates that the city must make the contributions for police officers, so those payments can't be cut????? It would be nice if he cared about ALL city employees. Not just the police.
Quote
 
 
+5 #9 adraianna moore 2011-06-23 04:26
well we are going to hear alot of of reasons for this and that in the next few months. This council has not a clue what the public really wants for the taxes that are paid. Public safety and infrastucture are the backbone of the city and of any city. We are concentrating on the items that are for show and are not doing a good job of it. Just look at our ballfields but we keep using our city employees to maintain them when their purpose would be better served elsewhere.Our streets are an embarassment but our canal trail get all of the attention. The priorities of our council are screwed up.
Quote
 
 
+3 #8 More Skeptical 2011-06-22 20:33
How can this process get this far along and all of a sudden, not only is the budget rejected by a 3 - 2 vote, but the three have recommendations to cut the budget. Sounds like side meeting of the illegal nature and blindsiding other members. The good news is it is an odd numbered year and there is another election in November.
Quote
 
 
+8 #7 Jennifer Alexander 2011-06-22 15:26
First of all..Let the Circus Begin!!..Isn't it interesting that a few months ago the city council voted to give the Police Dept. not 9(as requested) but 13 New cars at a cost of $350,000(because some of the current cars are unsafe according to Bobbitt)...then last night Bobbitt tells the City Manager to cut $350,000 from the budget..wonder where he got that figure? Is it fair for the Police dept to get what they requested(actal ly more), then to cut the exact amount requested for the new "cruisers" from the other departments' budget requests? What about the other departments'needs? Are their vehicles safe or does Bobbitt or any member of the council really care? I hope that the council isn't planning on handing out these "unsafe police cars" to the other departments if they need them. If they are unsafe for the Police, I am sure they are unsafe for Anyone. I wonder if the Police dept. will have to give up anything in this budget cut? You Call This Fair?????
Quote
 
 
+10 #6 CONCERNED 2011-06-22 14:55
You were very careful to say the "materials". How many city employee manhours were used to put up the new fence? A majority of our city budget is made up of employee salary and benefits and how we use those limited manhours is critical to the quality of services we taxpayers get. So don't try to mislead the public into thinking there is no taxpayer cost associated with this project. Quoting citizen:
Quoting cwec:
If we do not start making cuts this year we will be facing major cuts and big tax increases next year. Go by the ballfield at 11th st. and Vance st. and look at the new fence that is being put up. Is this a need or just a want because someone has kids that play ball. This is the type of spending that needs to be controlled better.


The materials for the fence at Ledgerwood was paid for through sponsorships and not from the City budget.
Quote
 
 
-1 #5 citizen 2011-06-22 14:30
Quoting cwec:
If we do not start making cuts this year we will be facing major cuts and big tax increases next year. Go by the ballfield at 11th st. and Vance st. and look at the new fence that is being put up. Is this a need or just a want because someone has kids that play ball. This is the type of spending that needs to be controlled better.


The materials for the fence at Ledgerwood was paid for through sponsorships and not from the City budget.
Quote
 
 
+4 #4 chuck 2011-06-22 05:41
ferebee maybe when you have a meeting you can use the theater and get a band to come out and play for you so you want feel like your being used or losing any money or wasting your time and our tax money will be put to good use!!!!!!!!!!
Quote
 
 
+8 #3 cwec 2011-06-22 03:11
If we do not start making cuts this year we will be facing major cuts and big tax increases next year. Go by the ballfield at 11th st. and Vance st. and look at the new fence that is being put up. Is this a need or just a want because someone has kids that play ball. This is the type of spending that needs to be controlled better.
Quote
 
 
+4 #2 Maureen 2011-06-22 02:40
Ferebee, we'd be happy to see the city council get paid nothing. It would line right up with your accomplishments , and at least we could argue you're all paid what you're worth.

As for the $350,000 we need in cuts, keeping longevity pay and merit pay at 100% is going the wrong direction. Those have to go as well.
Quote
 
 
+2 #1 adraianna moore 2011-06-22 01:47
oh my goodness this is so funny
Quote
 

Add comment

All comments posted on rrspin.com must be written in complete sentences with no text message abbreviations. No all caps comments will be allowed, that includes words written in capital letters for emphasis.

There is to be no profanity and there is to be no character assassination even if the person being written about is a suspect in a crime.
Comments that presume knowledge of a person’s home life, financial situation or other personal details will be not be posted as will comments which presume legal knowledge.

All comments must be on the topic of the story and offer the reader’s insight on a particular issue. rrspin.com will cease posting comments if the editor determines readers are infighting with one another and not staying on the topic of a story.

rrspin.com prefers readers use their real names because anonymous posters are accountable for their comments just as readers who post their names are.


Security code
Refresh