Cloudy

Roanoke Rapids, NC

66°F

Cloudy

Humidity: 100%

Wind: S at 4 mph

Banner

Wednesday, 22 June 2011 01:43

Council OKs RRT payment deferment


Rate this item
(0 votes)

City council tonight unanimously approved deferring $250,000 of its upcoming theater balloon payment, which is due the first of July.

In a memo from City Manager Paul Sabiston to council, Sabiston noted he and Finance Director MeLinda Hite spoke with representatives of Davenport & Company on deferring part of the payment.

The balloon payment is $680,000.

Sabiston said in the memo that deferring $250,000 of the payment using today's rates would equal $3,500 a year in additional costs. “The number may increase depending on many factors,” the memo says. “Primarily, if the actual bond interest rate increases, then the city's cost for this deferment will increase slightly. Davenport wanted the city to be informed of all potential consequences of the deferment but agreed that the deferment option was an attractive one at the present rate.”

If the bond rate did increase, the memo says, and the deferment cost increased, the city could pay off the deferred payment and not be subject to the carrying cost.

Sabiston noted in the memo that representatives from Davenport will visit the city in July to present information to council to explain the true nature of the debt while the next meeting will focus on different options to reduce or refinance the debt.

 

 

Lance Martin

Lance Martin

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

comments  

 
+2 #4 CONCERNED 2011-06-23 13:04
You need to check again. Ask Hite or Sabistan if they are promised and they will tell you that they are not. They are benefits that are subject to annual budget appropriation which means that they will be looked at each year to see if money is available. And I say money may not be available this year. As for deferrment, you're right we still owe a lot and that is the problem. Interest is accruing on that huge outstanding debt.

Quoting cwec:
If you check with the city then you will see that the longevity and bonus program is part of the employees package when they were hired. Taking these things away is like the longer you stay the less you make. This is why a number of employees have left or are planning to leave in the near future because it will cost them in the long run if they stay. On the subject of the deferment how many times has this been done in the past. It seems to me after several years of paying we still owe 21.5 million dollars.
Quote
 
 
+1 #3 cwec 2011-06-23 03:19
If you check with the city then you will see that the longevity and bonus program is part of the employees package when they were hired. Taking these things away is like the longer you stay the less you make. This is why a number of employees have left or are planning to leave in the near future because it will cost them in the long run if they stay. On the subject of the deferment how many times has this been done in the past. It seems to me after several years of paying we still owe 21.5 million dollars.
Quote
 
 
-4 #2 follow ups 2011-06-23 01:03
Quoting CONCERNED:
So we're not able to pay the debt we already have, but we want to ask the manager to add longevity and bunuses back to the budget. You guys need to be careful. The federal govt will not be there with a federal bailout program for the City and the taxpayers are beginning to think that you are incompetient.

Why are you concerned.....they can pay the late fees with the insurance savings......just say'n
Quote
 
 
+1 #1 CONCERNED 2011-06-22 15:02
So we're not able to pay the debt we already have, but we want to ask the manager to add longevity and bunuses back to the budget. You guys need to be careful. The federal govt will not be there with a federal bailout program for the City and the taxpayers are beginning to think that you are incompetient.
Quote
 

Add comment

All comments posted on rrspin.com must be written in complete sentences with no text message abbreviations. No all caps comments will be allowed, that includes words written in capital letters for emphasis.

There is to be no profanity and there is to be no character assassination even if the person being written about is a suspect in a crime.
Comments that presume knowledge of a person’s home life, financial situation or other personal details will be not be posted as will comments which presume legal knowledge.

All comments must be on the topic of the story and offer the reader’s insight on a particular issue. rrspin.com will cease posting comments if the editor determines readers are infighting with one another and not staying on the topic of a story.

rrspin.com prefers readers use their real names because anonymous posters are accountable for their comments just as readers who post their names are.


Security code
Refresh