Cloudy

Roanoke Rapids, NC

66°F

Cloudy

Humidity: 100%

Wind: S at 4 mph

Banner

Wednesday, 15 June 2011 02:33

Council OKs RRT advisory panel on split vote


Rate this item
(0 votes)

A theater advisory committee will be formed to guide the city on decisions about the struggling venue, which has lost between $75,000 to $76,000 in the last 10 months.

The decision to form a committee came on a 3-2 vote, with council members Ed Liverman and Greg Lawson voting against Councilwoman Suetta Scarbrough's motion during tonight's meeting.

Lawson and Liverman believed wording of the motion should be changed so the panel was not to give advice on booking acts the theater.

Opting to scrub a discussion of a avenue trees, the theater discussion fell in that slot on the agenda and Scarbrough made the motion to form the advisory panel.

“The ultimate goal of council is to sell the theater,” she read from a prepared statement, “Therefore freeing up money to provide services to the citizens at a reasonable cost, which is city council's charge to the community.”

The goals of the committee, Scarbrough said, are threefold: To advise council on ways to make the theater more productive through shows financed by prospective producers at reasonable rates; recommend or advise to council on maintaining an agreement with entertainment businesses to continue booking local events and activities to keep the theater open for tours; to recommend or advise council on ways to make the theater more attractive to potential buyers. “This should be done in a manner so as to market the Roanoke Rapids Theatre to national and international markets.”

Liverman wasn't sold. “When we say things in terms of more shows and prospective producers, we're finding ourselves in the theater business.”

The theater, Liverman said, has lost between $75,000 to $76,000 since Lafayette Gatling was ousted from the building last year. “I agree with the committee, I don't agree with them telling us we need more shows.”

Lawson agreed with Liverman. “We have to have money and artist fees. Where is that money coming from?”

Lawson said Taymac, which is currently running the venue, has not been successful. “To have a committee to look at how we sell would be in line.”

Councilman Carl Ferebee countered that even though he wanted to sell the theater, “It still costs us whether we're putting on shows or not.”

Councilman Ernest Bobbitt said there are independent producers who want to do shows at the venue with their own money. “Obviously, the goal is to sell it. We can have other people put on shows to keep it open. If we don't keep it open it will become another dump.”

Liverman said the city knows the theater debt is not going to be paid through shows. “It lost $76,000 in 10 months.”

With the city out of theater reserve fund, Liverman said, “That $1.7 million is on us next year.”

Said Mayor Emery Doughtie, “We have to do something to get rid of this negative infestation”

Bobbitt and Ferebee sided with Scarbrough on the matter.

Meanwhile, a proposal to sell some $58,000 worth of surplus equipment at the theater failed on a 3-2 vote, with Liverman, Ferebee and Bobbitt shooting down Lawson's motion.

The equipment to be sold was taken following an inventory by David Corlew, the manager of the Charlie Daniels Band.

“I'm not comfortable he's an expert,” Liverman said following the meeting.

Doughtie said following the meeting he would like to get the committee started as quickly as possible. He said council must also weigh the agreement it has with Taymac. “It's certainly been a concern and it's been discussed.”

 

 

Lance Martin

Lance Martin

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

comments  

 
+3 #4 Maureen 2011-06-17 01:55
Let's just hope they keep Steve Adair, Dan Russo, and Liz Branham off this advisory council. They're advice has already proven to be nothing but a bag of wind. Let's hope they select some QUALIFIED people to be on this council for a change.
Quote
 
 
0 #3 CONCERNED 2011-06-15 12:50
Doesn't the city already have a committee made up of local business people to advise on the RRT? i remember folks like Al Eatman and Hugh Bazemore being in that group. Where can this council find better?
Quote
 
 
+5 #2 Anthony Finney 2011-06-15 12:24
Do they REALLY need an advisory panel to figure out why they have lost $75,000-$76,000 in the last 10 months?!?!? STOP! I will tell you the answer for free!! It's because there have not been any shows out there, and the council is spending too much time arguing about some darn trees!!! WE went from the "Good Ol' Boy Connection" to the "Are You Smarter Than A 5th GRader Rejects" in our town government!!
Quote
 
 
+8 #1 citizen 2011-06-15 02:59
Just a heads up for the next time the leaders of rr decide to invest in something to better our city, lets put our money into a GOOD idea, like maybe some shopping outlets, a nice mall, good restaurants, museums, a permanent amphitheater. Something to draw travelers to our city, like Smithfield. They have the Jubilee down there and they also have outlets for people to shop. The city built the wrong thing first. They should have put there efforts into those outlets, or that aquarium we were supposed to get instead of losing all that money on randy parton. Tourists need more to do here besides that theater and wal-mart. Another thought: why is the farm fresh intended building being left to rot? Why cant we try for a target, petsmart, bed bath and beyond, an ulta, a shoe store, ANYTHING really to go into that shopping center without letting it rot? It's a shame what a terrible job the people in charge of this town do.
Quote
 

Add comment

All comments posted on rrspin.com must be written in complete sentences with no text message abbreviations. No all caps comments will be allowed, that includes words written in capital letters for emphasis.

There is to be no profanity and there is to be no character assassination even if the person being written about is a suspect in a crime.
Comments that presume knowledge of a person’s home life, financial situation or other personal details will be not be posted as will comments which presume legal knowledge.

All comments must be on the topic of the story and offer the reader’s insight on a particular issue. rrspin.com will cease posting comments if the editor determines readers are infighting with one another and not staying on the topic of a story.

rrspin.com prefers readers use their real names because anonymous posters are accountable for their comments just as readers who post their names are.


Security code
Refresh