Cloudy

Roanoke Rapids, NC

66°F

Cloudy

Humidity: 100%

Wind: N at 0 mph

Banner

Wednesday, 06 April 2011 01:38

Construction not only cost in transfer station


Rate this item
(0 votes)
Conceptual drawing of a transfer station. Conceptual drawing of a transfer station.

Construction will not be the only cost should the city build a solid waste transfer station, the engineer for the project told council at its work session tonight.

There three sites for further consideration in the city’s bid to build the station are:

 

Highway 158 off Deep Creek Road, the old landfill site, which contains 10 acres of land the city owns. Early evaluation lists this as the top site although there are wetlands issues and the soil must be examined.

 

The industrial area behind Kennametal, a 30 acre parcel, which has access issues and would possibly need road improvements.

 

Highway 158 at the old airport opposite the former Harley-Davidson dealership. This site is 50 acres and the biggest issue is sewer.

 

 

In a memo to council, Bill Dreitzler, North Carolina projects director for ms consultants, told council none of the sites need to be rezoned but would require conditional use permits, which do require public hearings.

The Deep Creek Road site, however, would require a roadway, which is estimated to cost $260,000 and $40,000 for water extension.

The industrial area in the Becker Industrial Park would require an access road estimated to cost $39,000.

The site near the old airport is in what Dreitzler described as a fairly residential area in which subdividing is not an option. “The city would have to buy the entire property.”

The next step in the transfer station issue will be for council to schedule a public hearing on the three sites. A decision on a public hearing date is likely to be made at council’s regular meeting next Tuesday at 7 p.m.

Mapping of the different sites would be shown. “Public input is extremely important,” Dreitzler said.

These three locations were narrowed down from seven finalists. While cost estimates for the transfer station are between $700,000 to $750,000, land acquisition costs remain unknown.

According to a memo from City Manager Paul Sabiston to city council, the initial projections for revenues and expenses are based on a total volume 28,000 tons of solid waste per year.

The city’s own residential solid waste and debris accounts for approximately 7,200 tons per year, the remainder an estimate of the commercial waste in the city, the memo says.

The city estimates an increase in revenues over expenses with a transfer station of $102,071 to $282,814. “This gain in annual net income is greater than the original memorandum provided to you as a result of the interest rate for a loan has dropped from 4 percent to the new market rate of 3.05 percent and the term of the loan for the repayment of the facility was extended from 10 years to 20 years in accord with traditional loan terms for such facilities,” the memo states.

 

Lance Martin

Lance Martin

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

comments  

 
0 #1 Maureen 2011-04-06 17:44
It sounds like some pretty creative math is being used here. When you factor in all the additional expenses, I wonder if there will be much increase in net income at all.
Quote
 

Add comment

All comments posted on rrspin.com must be written in complete sentences with no text message abbreviations. No all caps comments will be allowed, that includes words written in capital letters for emphasis.

There is to be no profanity and there is to be no character assassination even if the person being written about is a suspect in a crime.
Comments that presume knowledge of a person’s home life, financial situation or other personal details will be not be posted as will comments which presume legal knowledge.

All comments must be on the topic of the story and offer the reader’s insight on a particular issue. rrspin.com will cease posting comments if the editor determines readers are infighting with one another and not staying on the topic of a story.

rrspin.com prefers readers use their real names because anonymous posters are accountable for their comments just as readers who post their names are.


Security code
Refresh