Cloudy

Roanoke Rapids, NC

68°F

Cloudy

Humidity: 100%

Wind: N at 0 mph

Banner

Wednesday, 25 May 2011 21:50

City insurance bid proposals switched Featured


Rate this item
(3 votes)
Suetta Scrabrough made the motion to go against the recommendation of the city manager Tuesday. Suetta Scrabrough made the motion to go against the recommendation of the city manager Tuesday.

The employee insurance proposal which city council voted against Tuesday night was not the same proposal the company which lost the contract originally submitted as part of a bid request, Roanoke Rapids officials confirmed today.

City Manager Paul Sabiston used the incorrect proposal to support First Carolina Care getting the city's insurance business, documents reviewed by rrspin.com today show.

While Sabiston said following the Tuesday meeting the contract council unanimously approved, one submitted by First Carolina Agency of Roanoke Rapids, was not the lowest bid, documents and comments by city officials confirm otherwise.

After lengthy debate during a special meeting Tuesday, council opted to go against Sabiston's recommendation and approve the First Carolina Agency bid.

The First Carolina Agency bid was received by the May 10 deadline, city Finance Officer MeLinda Hite confirmed, as was the original First Carolina Care bid.

First Carolina Agency submitted a proposal for 60/40 coverage while First Carolina Care submitted one for 80/20 coverage.

The initial bid submitted by First Carolina Care would have cost the city $785,507.52, plus commission.

The First Carolina Agency's Blue Cross and Blue Shield proposal will cost the city $705,272 plus a $10,948 commission.

Tuesday, however, a different First Carolina Care proposal was discussed before city council.

Hite said the new First Carolina Care quote was added Tuesday and had not been quoted during a meeting last week when the proposals were pitched to council and department representatives.

Hite said in weighing the bids, "I'm looking at what it costs the taxpayers to fund this benefit. The city is required to cover full time employees and retirees. We went with the lowest cost to the city."

Hite will be reviewing the coverage with First Carolina Agency owner Phil Hux to determine if the city's policy can redistributed to provide affordable costs to employees who choose to have their family, spouses or children covered. "You can't base this on the assumption someone is going to bring a spouse onboard."

In a summary of the issue, which will most likely be delivered to city council, Hite states, "In an effort to control insurance costs and and continue to offer city employees and retirees competitive insurance benefits, the city advertised (a request for proposals) for health insurance coverage."

She notes in the summary, health insurance premiums have been rapidly increasing over the last few years. "The city received two bids in response to their request for proposals."

The bids included levels of insurance coverage, amounts of deductibles, out of pocket expenses and physician co-pay. "We evaluated the proposals received based on the highest level of coverage at the most economical costs to the city and its employees.

"From the finance director's perspective, I have to look at what it will cost the taxpayers to fund this benefit. As outlined in the personnel policy manual, we are required to provide health insurance to our full time employees (of which there are 137) and to our retirees (of which there are 27)."

This year, the summary notes, the city subsidized the premium, the deductible (city pays $2,000 of the $2,500 deductible) and diagnostic, testing (employees are reimbursed up to $300 for testing) in the current year.

"The first phase of the process has been completed, awarding the bid to First Carolina Agency, now we will start the second phase of the process and that is to meet with the agent to ensure affordable insurance coverage if they choose to include their spouse, children or family. We want the best insurance at an affordable cost — we will now sharpen our pencils and work diligently with the agent to ensure that this relationship will be a win-win for employees and the taxpayers."

Council member Suetta Scarbrough, who made the motion Tuesday to go with First Carolina Agency, confirmed a different bid was submitted than originally reviewed. "We set it straight last night."

City Attorney Gilbert Chichester, who also confirmed the proposal was not the same reviewed at last Thursday's presentation, said there was nothing illegal about what happened and council does not have to seek bids for services like insurance.

Chichester said, however, "If you're going to solicit bids, even if it's not required, it seems to me you should follow the guidelines for those proposed, that you should follow the guidance you get at the cutoff date. It's more a business type integrity question."

Hux said he had no comment on the bid switch matter but will work with the city on lowering the cost for family, spouses and children. "I know we can do it."

 

Last modified on Wednesday, 25 May 2011 22:24
Lance Martin

Lance Martin

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

comments  

 
-1 #7 LRJ 2011-05-28 11:25
THE PRESENT INSURANCE NO WAY COVERS WHAT THE PREVIOUS INSURANCE THE CITY HAD WITH MR. HUX.COVERD .I'AM PRETTY SURE THAT ANY EMPLOYEE THAT HAS USED THE PRESENT INSURANCE WILL AGREE.I HAVE ALWAYS HEARD YOU GET WHAT YOU PAY FOR.GO BACK TO PREVIOUS PLAN THAT THE CITY HAD WITH MR. HUX.AT LEAST THEN IT HELPED THE EMPLOYEE
THEY SHOULD BE MORE IMPORTANT THAN THE BOTTOM LINE.THIS IS JUST MY THOUGHT. THANKS.
Quote
 
 
+5 #6 cwec 2011-05-27 11:26
This is not the only behind closed door meeting deal that is going on. This city council has more behind closed door meetings than the previous council every had and trying to find out what is going on is impossible. If this council does not change and quit doing these types of deals we as taxpayers are going to be footing the bill for alot more. Come to the council meetings and get involved. Doing business without a bottom line figure first is a bad way of making decisions that effect alot of people.
Quote
 
 
+10 #5 DLW 2011-05-27 02:30
No matter what anyone says it is the "Good Ole Boy" game at its finest. Not only are Liverman and Hux office partners add Rep Michael Wray into the mix who also is tied in with Mr Hux's insurance agency. These are the people that got the City Manager terminated and now they can go back to running the town because the City Manager didnt bow down to these people. When are the people in Roanoke Rapids going to wake up and see whats going on..
Quote
 
 
+3 #4 James Debro 2011-05-27 01:27
Quoting LSD:
Is the Good Ol' Boy syndrome at work again here?


Pretty much. The Good Ol' Boy syndrome is occurring everywhere.....
Quote
 
 
+10 #3 LSD 2011-05-26 21:13
Is the Good Ol' Boy syndrome at work again here?
Quote
 
 
-11 #2 Lance Martin 2011-05-26 00:54
According to the city attorney, Mr. Liverman's work setup through Snipes in the First Carolina Agency building is not considered to be a conflict of interest since Snipe's is an independent insurance firm. — Editor
Quote
 
 
+10 #1 Gymrat 2011-05-26 00:19
After reading this article, it looks as if Ed Liverman has struck agian! Don't Ed works with Phil Hux selling insurance? Would this not be considered a conflict of interest? I can hear people now saying, well Ed does not work for First Carolina, he works for Snipes. Point is they both share an office and Phil Hux's hand is tied in with Snipes. People of RR need to wake up and smell the coffee. As Randy Jackson of American Idol says "Ed is in it to win it!!!!"
Quote
 

Add comment

All comments posted on rrspin.com must be written in complete sentences with no text message abbreviations. No all caps comments will be allowed, that includes words written in capital letters for emphasis.

There is to be no profanity and there is to be no character assassination even if the person being written about is a suspect in a crime.
Comments that presume knowledge of a person’s home life, financial situation or other personal details will be not be posted as will comments which presume legal knowledge.

All comments must be on the topic of the story and offer the reader’s insight on a particular issue. rrspin.com will cease posting comments if the editor determines readers are infighting with one another and not staying on the topic of a story.

rrspin.com prefers readers use their real names because anonymous posters are accountable for their comments just as readers who post their names are.


Security code
Refresh