Clear

Roanoke Rapids, NC

52°F

Clear

Humidity: 88%

Wind: N at 4 mph

Banner

Wednesday, 11 January 2012 02:28

Brandy Creek topic of closed session briefing


Rate this item
(0 votes)
This chart shows tax Brandy Creek tax values. This chart shows tax Brandy Creek tax values. UNC Center for Civil Rights

After adjourning a brief meeting, city council went into closed session tonight, presumably to discuss a refund being requested by residents from the Brandy Creek community for three of the years it was inside the city limits.

Mayor Emery Doughtie said later this evening no action was taken on the matter following adjournment of the closed session, in which County Attorney Glynn Rollins sat in on as well as City Attorney Gilbert Chichester. “I think we're going to let Gilbert think about it some more and see how the county reacts. Sometime in the next week or so we will get to it. We want to make sure we do the right thing as well as the legal thing. We had ourselves a good hour's work listening to Gilbert and Glynn.”

Following adjournment of the regular meeting, the mayor said each government involved in the refund request would address it during meetings. The commissioners will address the matter at its work session Monday night. The Weldon City Schools Board of Education must also address the matter.

At issue is money the residents of Brandy Creek say they are due for the years 2007-2009 when it was in the city limits following a 2005 annexation to pave the way for the Carolina Crossroads Music and Entertainment District. The annexation has since been annulled.

The years in question are when residents and the University of North Carolina Center for Civil Rights say residents had to pay taxes that skyrocketed from 700 to 1,200 percent.

The money sought is broken down as follows: $27,000 from the county; $24,000 from the city and $6,000 from the Weldon school district.

Lance Martin

Lance Martin

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

comments  

 
+7 #1 Michael 2012-01-12 16:35
It's time to demand that the city council implement an audio record its closed session meetings, and a policy for the process for releasing the audio recordings after confidential business is complete, in compliance with state laws. Article 33 of the NC state statutes, § 143‑318.11 state that, "General policy matters may not be discussed in a closed session and nothing herein shall be construed to permit a public body to close a meeting that otherwise would be open merely because an attorney employed or retained by the public body is a participant." We need fewer back room dealings and more transparency in city government.
Quote
 

Add comment

All comments posted on rrspin.com must be written in complete sentences with no text message abbreviations. No all caps comments will be allowed, that includes words written in capital letters for emphasis.

There is to be no profanity and there is to be no character assassination even if the person being written about is a suspect in a crime.
Comments that presume knowledge of a person’s home life, financial situation or other personal details will be not be posted as will comments which presume legal knowledge.

All comments must be on the topic of the story and offer the reader’s insight on a particular issue. rrspin.com will cease posting comments if the editor determines readers are infighting with one another and not staying on the topic of a story.

rrspin.com prefers readers use their real names because anonymous posters are accountable for their comments just as readers who post their names are.


Security code
Refresh